Skip to main content

Villainize to Heroize


We’ll call this more of a rambling string of only partially-coherent thought. But it’s been on my mind more and more.

It seems like everybody’s out to fight against somebody somewhere. We’ve all got our own enemies in some form or another from the less-than-serious “I hate that girl who always comments in class” to the more dramatic “everyone in [insert political party or organization] is so immoral and going to ruin the world.” I’ve spoken about dichotomies before as well as stereotypes. We all hate being defined unless it’s an “us” v “them” situation where we suddenly see our friend group as the brothers on the battlefield courageously fighting against the fray of people different than us that we sometimes just don’t like and generally think are either “too cool for us” or maybe a little too awkward. I’m guilty of this.

Memes don’t help with this, either. I guess that’s where this rant begins.

I've recently noticed that every time someone posts something slightly antagonistic or even self-aggrandizing, it only makes sense in a world where they are the “outsider” or the “underdog” or the “martyr” for some cause of varying significance. And in order to do that, they have to imagine for themselves that there are actually only two sides of each story. So, they put words in everyone’s mouth and give them specially defined characteristics that fit their preconceived narrative. I will give two meme examples.

Example A (I will use both sides of the political spectrum, so bear with me).

With a picture of Dwight Schrute in the background, the meme stated:

"You think being anti-abortion makes you pro-life? False. You are simply pro-birth with no regard for the quality of life" (source below).

I don’t want to comment on the actual politics of this, but I do think it’s odd that it confidently separates pro-life and pro-abortion into people who have “no regard” for life’s quality v people who care (i.e. unvirtuous v virtuous, or in old-fashion terms, good v evil). As if people who don’t believe in abortion have never given any thought to anything else because they clearly have “no regard for quality of life.” What do these meme-creators imagine motivates pro-life people, then? Clearly it’s not a concern for others. Forgive me for doubting that.. What if they just had a different idea on how to deal with life's challenges?  Did I go too far with that unearthly suggestion?  

More to the point, it’s a lot easier to feel like a noble hero fighting for an unpopular cause when you can paint your opponent as someone with zero virtues. Gone are the days, it seems, when you could disagree because that’s life, diversity, and opinion. Today, it’s as if everyone who disagrees must be painted as some sort of psychotic demon bent on ruining the world. Yes, I realize that sounds extreme (case in point?), but it’s starting to make me realize that noble cultural warriors might need anti-cultural villains in order to feel purposeful. If you can’t find them on your own – well, why not create them? Let’s call it the #megamindcomplex, albeit in reverse (Villains can be made?).

Example B:

A meme of the "caveman" with the caption "The rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed...so easy a caveman can understand it."

Yeah, because apparently this issue is so obvious that a large portion of Americans are dumber than cavemen. The creator of this meme probably believes that – but can we see why that’s a bit of an unhealthy approach to life? If your enemy is a dumb caveman who will lead you to inevitable ruin by taking all your guns, then you have to fight them to survive! Finding an enemy justifies the hero’s dramatics.

It’s like something out of dystopian novel. My sister would tell you that it’s the message of Tomorrowland. The idea that we’re all so obsessed with an “inevitable” apocalyptic fate that we end up creating the drama all on our own. I’ll take it step further by saying that maybe sometimes - and this more as a thought experiment – we’re less convinced about a coming apocalypse than we are determined to be the heroes and heroines of our own stories with our own personally-configured morals, obstacles, sacrifices, and rewards. To turn what was once externally-experienced into something internally-constructed. Are we defending the world, then, or our own ego? It’s like we think that to be a hero, we need to forcibly turn someone into a villain. And we desperately want to feel like heroes.

I have no idea if this is accurate, but I keep thinking that maybe we’d learn to get along a little easier if we stopped villainizing everyone. This is beyond politics, and I’ve said that before. Extrovert v. Introvert. Jocks v Nerds. Feelings v Reason. Who will rule the world one day? Who is the hero of the story?

Now, I’m not one to run away from absolute truths. I’m still a good v. evil type of person. I love stories where the noble character like Harry Potter or Katniss Everdeen end up saving the world through their moral convictions and determined self-sacrifice. I think there are lot of messages to be found. After all, I studied domestic terrorism in college. There are definitely evil dudes out there.

But that doesn’t mean that every neighbor, colleague, and social media personality that disagrees with you is one of them. If we turn everyone with an opposing viewpoint into a villain, we’ll soon be stuck in a metaphorical cave watching shadows on the walls, or fighting windmills in the name of chivalry and then wondering why history calls us crazy. Self-proclaimed heroes. 

And what becomes of the people we intended to save? Are they sacrificed on the altar of ego or placed in the category of our enemy? Or maybe, the tough reality is that heroes and villains aren’t actually made in the mind-palaces of the self-obsessed. That maybe, in the real world, the line between what is good and what is evil isn’t as simple as what one person merely believes or wants. As if truth weren’t actually about you, and neither was heroism.

In a world of moral relativism, I’m starting to wonder if such an archaic formula is acceptable anymore. Like maybe Voldemort was the good guy and your annoying next-door-neighbor is not.

But who decides? And therein lies the problem. When we villainize to heroize, soon no one will be left to fight or save. And the story ends in ashes.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Response to The Church of Jesus Christ's Policy on Same-Sex Couples and Children

The young man and his girlfriend had lived together for 8 years. They’d had a daughter together. Both their paychecks went towards sustaining their small home. And they wanted to be baptized. Normally, it would seem rational to tell them to stop living together so they could get baptized. But this was a family. And that’s not how things worked. While separation still an acceptable solution, we were instead encouraged to have them get married before baptism. Why? Because a temporary separation just for the benefits of baptism was no security that they wouldn’t end up living together again—this time breaking sacred covenants. It was strongly urged, then, that they wait for marriage before getting baptized. The waiting process in Brazil is long. And sometimes, one couple or the other also has to  go through a complicated legal process of divorce from a previous partner. But, we tell them, it’s better to wait. The church has never been interested in a numerical manifestation of c...

Integrity: the missing ingredient

There was one good thing about Gingrich's response to the opening question of the GOP debate in South Carolina. In his attempt to avoid the question, he provided the answer to it. It's simple really. He has absolutely no understanding of integrity. Or why it matters. Let’s try to clear it up for him. In a recent class I took at BYU, our professor pointed to studies on the relationship between the treatment of women and  the level of corruption within governments and societies. It was a fascinating study. And while the subject may be freely and continually researched, the point here is to lay the groundwork for the casual story. Ultimately, the degradation of the family unit, specifically in the treatment of women,  leads to degradation in our governing institutions. How? Because families are unique in their ability to instill certain values within us, even at an early age. Those who dishonor marital vows ( like through adultery, pornography, ect…) demonstrate a lack of se...

Make America Fake Again

If Hillary got indicted by that right-wing FBI And good ole Bernie’s heart had him lying down to die If all the other candidates were thrown into a ring, And killed each other off with straw-man weaponry If that thing called ‘foreign policy’ was really just a game And experience was more about reality tv show fame If Muslims were all evil and the refugees a scam Or the terrorist threats a joke and the Arab Spring a sham If Americans were morons, duped on marijuana dreams Or Mexicans were rapists, building our walls to stop their schemes If the poor could be delivered by a real estate tycoon And illegals could be rounded up, like animals two by two If truth were merely relative and anything could fly And insults were called speeches—substantive, not denied If the moral compass of the land were broken right in two And intellectuals deported for revealing what is true If the world became a fantasy shrouded in lies and sin,...